<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in WooMe Has People Talking (Quickly).</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:31:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WooMe Has People Talking (Quickly).</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/woome-has-people-talking-quickly/#comment-9102664</link><description>sexii can i......</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sexii</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:31:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WooMe Has People Talking (Quickly).</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/woome-has-people-talking-quickly/#comment-1574130</link><description>Woo Me looks interesting, like &lt;a href="http://speeddating.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;speeddating.com&lt;/a&gt;, but I’m sure they both will have similar problems like, most people do not have webcams yet and the ideal users of this site will probably old souls desperate to find love which is creepy. Both sites need features that allow users to block unwanted ‘dates’ from seeing their profiles.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BobM</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:18:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WooMe Has People Talking (Quickly).</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/woome-has-people-talking-quickly/#comment-1574129</link><description>When I tried WooMe out, I was really impressed by the lack of latency with the video. Really impressive. I wish live video platforms did as good a job with this as WooMe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jonnygoldstein</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>