<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:58:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-21246630</link><description>The answer is simple - twitter mobile version is without nofollow so you can drop your links there</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maxyRO</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-17218540</link><description>When it comes to &lt;a rel="follow" href="http://www.sergiubirzu.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;seo&lt;/a&gt; services there are only a handful of companies who really know what they're doing. Only these know what content is all about, fixing site issues, URL canonicalization and rewrites and getting you a lot of links.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">socialmaker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:54:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-17200343</link><description>yeah and it will really hurt their page rank.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webrochester1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-14997376</link><description>Great post.. Twitter is a big source of traffic for all of us here, it definitely should count!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">designer000</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:14:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-14815422</link><description>This is very interesting... This is really the problem about twitter.. I hope this will be solve now.. It is really nice that you are talking about this issue.. Great post..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evoke001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:15:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-8609811</link><description>That’s some interesting points you have raised.  I wonder if it usually happens as you have said. Anyway I learnt something new all the same.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:44:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-8348963</link><description>Ya Exactly. Twitter can automatically determine who is a spammer and who isn’t. Once that has been determined, the site can remove the “nofollow” tag from all users that aren’t spammers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seo Services India</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5840176</link><description>I agree with you!  There can be some sort of probation period for new users.  After the probation period is over, the account is reviewed to see if it's spam or not (pretty easy to tell).  Then, the "no-follow" is removed.  Solves the problem, yet lets it count.  Twitter is  a HUGE source of traffic for all of us, it definintely should count!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachel Levy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:11:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5840041</link><description>I agree with Corvida; the juice is not the point of Twitter. Traffic follows excellent messages and conversations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ironically, your blog implements nofollow on urls within comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashbuckles</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:07:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5840036</link><description>Most online success stories like Twitter keep ignoring the obvious: people want to make money online. This is so obvious that people cleverly disguise their true intentions. If you asked, I bet 70% of so of people on twitter have a hidden agenda: more traffic, more sales, more revenue. Especially in these tough economic times. The notion that one is going to sit at his computer all day doing tweets with nothing in return but some type of recognition or digital friendships is ludicrous. So, yes, SEO is needed, link backs, traffic, sales, revenue, etc. That's what people want. Who has the time to sit around doing blogs or tweets for no money? You've gotta be pretty lonely or be a social outcast if there is no monetray benefit in your online activities. To me, it's all about socializing and making money or it ain't worth my time. Life is too short to tweet it away.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tweet Tweet No Money</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:07:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5839991</link><description>No, it would just invite a giant mess. I love inbound links as much as the next guy, but using Twitter as the mechanism would ruin it for me. Sure, maybe it will take longer to build up your links from visitors, readers, commenters - but those links will be more worthwhile to have IMHO.There is no quick fix - there are no shortcuts to SEO and the sooner everyone accepts that you'll have to work hard and deliver value to real humans to the point they link to you, the better for everyone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">virtuallin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:05:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5839900</link><description>Twitter would turn into the world's largest link-baiting scam, and it would become less of a social resource.  There are plenty of ways that Twitter generates SEO juice already without implementing nofollow.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony Hereld</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:01:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5839704</link><description>Social Media is about people.  If you leverage the power of the medium the way it's intended to be used, you'll get more traffic from Twitter than you would have from SEO.  Sure, it takes "time" to get to a point where people care about what you have to say, but Social Media is not about short cuts - it's about making real connections.  If one's primary motivation for Twitter is to get more PageRank points, I say "stay out of my Twitterverse."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The last thing I want is for Twitter's bandwidth to be frittered away by the SEO inbound-link starved trolls out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Daiv  &lt;a href="http://Twitter.com/DaivRawks" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://Twitter.com/DaivRawks&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daiv Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:53:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5839589</link><description>It would be great if all the Twitter links would count towards SEO.  We need all the help we can get!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sue Adams</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:49:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5082994</link><description>I understand your dilemma, but SEO juice is not the point of Twitter. Screw the juice, I'll take the visitors any day!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corvida</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:17:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5081432</link><description>Nick,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I follow you exactly. I even think your idea is realistic - twitter does know who is worthy or not - but I bet the payoff for them to do it (and deal with all the spam abuse tactics) would make it very difficult for the them to prioritize.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it is a shame that all these highly credible link authority events happen that are ignored.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, the whispers are that googlebot doesn't ingore nofollow links in it's quest for every page on the Internet. The further speculation is that for certain sites they know to be pretty credible, such as wikipedia, they may even be adding that link to their authority ranking. So it's conceivable they are already doing it for twitter ... but that latter part is mostly conjecture.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tedr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:39:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5080309</link><description>I would argue no because it would flood Twitter with SEO spam. The purpose of no-follows, is in part, as an anti-spam tactic enforced by Google to keep their results clean. If every Retweet became a link their API would get slammed with scripts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MartinEdic</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:33:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s My SEO From Twitter?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/twitter-seo/#comment-5073807</link><description>I agree that if a site is linked to on Twitter, the vote should count.  I'm not sure what the impact would be on Twitter's struggling infrastructure if Google was crawling and following all the links. If it's high, that might be another reason, besides spammers, that they're using "nofollow". Somehow, I doubt the impact would be too much. Also, I got here from your Tweet. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">elgreg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:58:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>