<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Twitter Reduces Functionality for WWDC</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:37:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Reduces Functionality for WWDC</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/twitter-reduces-functionality-for-wwdc/#comment-1574876</link><description>I think saying that Twitter was useless because they turned off some features during WWDC is a drastic over reaction.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What does Twitter do?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It tells me what my friends are doing right now.  It did that perfectly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everything else is gravy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Thorp</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:37:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Reduces Functionality for WWDC</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/twitter-reduces-functionality-for-wwdc/#comment-1574877</link><description>Agreed, they've turned off so much functionality (view replies, archives, statistics, limited API calls, etc) that it is basically down or at least unusable in its current form. I suppose they are motivated to have good uptime stats, but it is crippled in its current state and basically useless.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">warrenss</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:13:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>