<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Twitter Goes Head to Head With Digg.</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:04:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Goes Head to Head With Digg.</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/twitter-goes-head-to-head-with-digg/#comment-1574162</link><description>TwitThis is not new, its been around about a year. Its by the same guys as &lt;a href="http://crazyegg.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;crazyegg.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Breslin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:04:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Goes Head to Head With Digg.</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/twitter-goes-head-to-head-with-digg/#comment-1574163</link><description>Don't we in effect already clog Twitter with our self promoting blog posts? In fact, that is how I found out about this blog post, from Nick's Tweet.  I think this site is just extending what we are already doing to include sites that we do not (potentially) authors ourselves.  If it does in fact turn Twitter into Digg, then those Twitter faithfuls will find something else to replace it with.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:14:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>