<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://socialtimes.disqus.com/the_social_capitalist8217s_manifesto/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:08:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-153380186</link><description>Hi Nick, your attributes of the Social Capitalist really resonsate with me, I was in a Facebook conversation with a friend and I was accused of being "anti-capitalist" as I stated that I could no longer stomach the westernised  corporate world claims of building "sustainable" enterprises when the reality is that they are predominantly driven by short-term shareholder demands for increasing returns - this led to me to reflecting on what I did believe in, I am familiar with the concepts of Social Capital and Social Capitalism, and wondered if such a thing as a Social Capitalist existed.  Googling the term found your blog and really connected with the attributes that you had put together, do you have any objections with me sharing them with a network of like minded individuals?  My connection is less to do with social media, but when you reflect on what is happening in the middle east, facilitated to some extent by the social media - it demonstrates the power that like minded people hold</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Bowtle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:08:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-54804928</link><description>A commodity is a fancy word for luxury, if your labour is a luxury to your employer, then you are practically his Slave; specially if there are no regulations to protect You (the most precious resourse in Gods Eyes) from his MANY ABUSES!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francisco Martinez</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:37:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-34180836</link><description>Both terms "social" and "capitalist" does not really seem to go together.
&lt;br&gt;But I quite like the ideas presented in this post.Thank you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Film indirmeden izle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:37:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-19623815</link><description>Both forms of government are flawed to say that least!!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewheart</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:23:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-17818147</link><description>Hi!
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Congratulations! Your readers have submitted and voted for your blog at The Daily Reviewer. We compiled an exclusive list of the Top 100 social media Blogs, and we are glad to let you know that your blog was included! You can see it at &lt;a href="http://thedailyreviewer.com/top/social-media/2" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://thedailyreviewer.com/to...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;You can claim your Top 100 Blogs Award here : &lt;a href="http://thedailyreviewer.com/pages/badges/social-media" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://thedailyreviewer.com/pa...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;P.S. This is a one-time notice to let you know your blog was included in one of our Top 100 Blog categories. You might get notices if you are listed in two or more categories.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;P.P.S. If for some reason you want your blog removed from our list, just send an email to angelina@thedailyreviewer.com with the subject line "REMOVE" and the link to your blog in the body of the message.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Cheers!
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Angelina Mizaki
&lt;br&gt;Selection Committee President
&lt;br&gt;The Daily Reviewer
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://thedailyreviewer.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://thedailyreviewer.com&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily Reviewer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-17818008</link><description>It would have been a perfect world, if we could simply combine terms and invest new ones;))
&lt;br&gt;Yes, I got the idea is what manner "social" was used in the post
&lt;br&gt;Reading Marx:
&lt;br&gt;"A society is capitalist if most production is carried on by employees working with means of production (equipment and materials) belonging to their employer, producing commodities which belong to the employer. (Employees: those whose services are treated as commodities. 'Labour is a commodity like any other')"
&lt;br&gt;I think he only missed to say that employees belong to the employer, as well:)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">desnik</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:05:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-17817196</link><description>So don't think of social as "socialist" ... it's social in the sense of socializing with others.  Socializers and capitalists fit well with one another :)  Combine the two and you have a social capitalist!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-17815998</link><description>Both terms "social" and "capitalist" does not really seem to go together.
&lt;br&gt;But I quite like the ideas presented in this post.
&lt;br&gt;SMEs re the driving power and core of every market regulated economy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">desnik</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-17746699</link><description>@John,  I definitely agree that not all of Marx's ideas are accurate but I simply thought it would be an interesting perspective for defining another position.  This idea can be applied everywhere but the main point is the attributes of social capitalists who take advantage of these new technologies/platforms.  To help their ideas spread.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick ONeill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:26:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-17746394</link><description>The digital revolution almost proves Marx's critique of capital consolidation during the industrial era, but it also shows how dated and irrelevant his solutions are to the new economy.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;At this point, abolishing ownership of the means of production would be oppressive to average people with a bit of initiative.  This is because a computer, internet connection, and free CMS script are all you need to create profit directly from own labor.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The information revolution appears to be putting control over production in more decentralized hands.  Soon we'll even see it in machine manufacturing as the 3D printers become more common and affordable.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Of course, the power of the "captains of industry" isn't completely gone, nor will they completely give in without a fight.  If any tribes get too big, the kings might notice.  Its just getting harder for them to do anything about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JohnMcDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://socialtimes.com/the-social-capitalists-manifesto_b1372#comment-17738183</link><description>What an amazing post, as an entrepreneur, you need to take risks and be highly adaptable to change, that's our advantage over large companies. We can change before them; better, faster, stronger.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertJLowe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:02:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
