<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in The Shift From Active to Passive Sharing</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/the_shift_from_active_to_passive_sharing/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:02:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Shift From Active to Passive Sharing</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/the-shift-from-active-to-passive-sharing/1569#comment-435635514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Passive sharing is the way to go &lt;a href="http://securereliablehosting.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://securereliablehosting.com"&gt;Web Host&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul David</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:02:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Shift From Active to Passive Sharing</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/the-shift-from-active-to-passive-sharing/1569#comment-52384371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank u so much for ur article, i like it very much. and learn so much from that, thank u , really.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlb jerseys</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 05:52:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Shift From Active to Passive Sharing</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/the-shift-from-active-to-passive-sharing/1569#comment-48462596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for such a informative post. This is always a hot topic for debates and made a interesting read. Could have done with a few more pictures if possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">barristers chambers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:41:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Shift From Active to Passive Sharing</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/the-shift-from-active-to-passive-sharing/1569#comment-44703074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, few interesting issues covered. Like your style. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Speeding Fines</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:39:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Shift From Active to Passive Sharing</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/the-shift-from-active-to-passive-sharing/1569#comment-12539222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The static web pages of today will slowly manifest into dynamic highly social environments. The real question is if all of this chaos can eventually make sense with everybody trying to become a serious player in the social web.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">butt plug</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:01:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Shift From Active to Passive Sharing</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/the-shift-from-active-to-passive-sharing/1569#comment-1574912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a dark side to passive sharing: one reason it leads to more sharing is because the burden of filtering is shifted from the sender to the receiver.  In passive sharing, the sharer may feel more comfortable doing it because he does not feel "self-important" and so shares more, as Joe says.  But this lack of restraint also means the receiver needs to do the work of separating what is likely to be valuable to him from what is not -- work that in the active model is done by the sharer.  I think passive sharing will come to be thought of more as "permissioning" and will become more useful once it is coupled with either search or contextual delivery.  i.e. I say who I am willing to share what with, but it doesn't get delivered to them until there is some reason for them to want it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">George Eberstadt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:50:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>