<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in The Guide to Success in Social Media</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:47:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Guide to Success in Social Media</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/the-guide-to-success-in-social-media/#comment-3206236</link><description>Nick, are you suggesting that a social media site owner, such as myself, should also have an individual blog site via &lt;a href="http://blogger.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;blogger.com&lt;/a&gt; ect...for other social media connections?  If my social media site has blogging functionality should I simply be using my own profile/blog or even then still create an outside blog?  I enjoyed the read and your insights.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nik Scalise</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:47:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guide to Success in Social Media</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/the-guide-to-success-in-social-media/#comment-1574845</link><description>While most of your points here are pretty simple and straightforward, in concert they provide a great guide to those just starting up in the space.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd add one more: track metrics. Page views, unique visitors to your blog, comments left, people following you on twitter, how many people have burned your feeds, etc.  This will allow you with some hard statistics as to how your efforts are progressing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:06:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guide to Success in Social Media</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/the-guide-to-success-in-social-media/#comment-1574844</link><description>Very informative and simply explained. Thankyou. Yes we agree about using Blogger rather than &lt;a href="http://Wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; when you are not hosting your own blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blogger are more flexible about the content of your blog in comparison to Wordpress.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndrewAndDenise</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:36:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guide to Success in Social Media</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/the-guide-to-success-in-social-media/#comment-1574843</link><description>@David, please feel free to forward this on!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guide to Success in Social Media</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/the-guide-to-success-in-social-media/#comment-1574842</link><description>@4four1ones, I wrote is more customizable than &lt;a href="http://Wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; blogs.  &lt;a href="http://Wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; blogs are not hosted on your server.  I have a wordpress blog as well and it works great, I wouldn't switch to anything else but I know how to manage my server.  Most people don't and that's why I suggested blogger is better than the Wordpress hosted &lt;a href="http://Wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; blogs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guide to Success in Social Media</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/the-guide-to-success-in-social-media/#comment-1574841</link><description>I'm not sure that I agree that Blogger is a better choice due to customizing options against the Wordpress platform. Wordpress is the forerunner of all blogging platforms with the most plug-ins available. I am interested to find out why you think Blogger is better. Blogger is free, yes, but you point out that you should get a domain. Now you can point a domain to a blogger page but I would rather have full control of my blog with a wordpress platform installed. Just my 2 cents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@4four1ones&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://TheLeetGeeks.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;TheLeetGeeks.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://4four1ones.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;4four1ones.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">4four1ones</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:10:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guide to Success in Social Media</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/the-guide-to-success-in-social-media/#comment-1574839</link><description>Very informative ...dont forget squidoo...over all good stuff....as long as your social media marketing campaign is well planned and executed, you will rise above the rest...so keep up the good work!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Canchola your Specializ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:45:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guide to Success in Social Media</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/the-guide-to-success-in-social-media/#comment-1574840</link><description>I could see us forwarding this as advice to our users, and not just because it mentions TubeMogul.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:43:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>