<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Staying Out of The Woods So I Can See The Trees.</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/staying_out_of_the_woods_so_i_can_see_the_trees/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:16:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Staying Out of The Woods So I Can See The Trees.</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/staying-out-of-the-woods-so-i-can-see-the-trees/1279#comment-1574339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Irreverance is good, but it's not always right.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So for example, that still doesn't tell me why you guys don't cross-link. I see that as anti-community, anti-social.  Where's the skeptical reason behind that?  If you shut down all criticism, you are not part of the community, and you are not  open to gain information.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:16:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Staying Out of The Woods So I Can See The Trees.</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/staying-out-of-the-woods-so-i-can-see-the-trees/1279#comment-1574338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Aaron,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn't write this ... Anthony did&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:36:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Staying Out of The Woods So I Can See The Trees.</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/staying-out-of-the-woods-so-i-can-see-the-trees/1279#comment-1574337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, Nick.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Brazell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:46:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>