<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Social Apps Should Get You Laid</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/social_apps_should_get_you_laid/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:10:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Social Apps Should Get You Laid</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/social-apps-should-get-you-laid/1508#comment-47027456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting article, come whit more stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">online dating</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:10:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Apps Should Get You Laid</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/social-apps-should-get-you-laid/1508#comment-6704384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aside from just the fun part of it, social networking is really becoming a means of people finding their mate! Amazingly, there are many success stories of couples who met on these very sites!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">online dating</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Apps Should Get You Laid</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/social-apps-should-get-you-laid/1508#comment-5627140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting article!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Krystal Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:41:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Apps Should Get You Laid</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/social-apps-should-get-you-laid/1508#comment-1574790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nick,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Facebook's entertainment slant comes from its origins and is self-reinforcing. Take a look at the chapter I submitted for the upcoming "Psychology of Facebook" book. IMHO, it addresses the questions you ask.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb"&gt;http://docs.google.com/Doc?...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Plus, here is the site for the book, that is coming out of the sequel to the famous Stanford Facebook class:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com"&gt;http://www.psychologyofface...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would love to hear you thoughts on the role of context.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>