<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Public Figure = &amp;#8220;Substantial Public Debate&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/public_figure_8220substantial_public_debate8221/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:31:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Public Figure = &amp;#8220;Substantial Public Debate&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/public-figure-substantial-public-debate/1106#comment-65708473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have repeated your assertion that posting a photo or opinion makes you a public figure for defamation purposes, and your opinion that "According to the law," it does, but you haven't cited any law. What court case or legal treatise or authority of any kind do you base your opinion on? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jfmhickey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:31:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>