<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in New York Times Goes Social With TimesPeople</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:29:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New York Times Goes Social With TimesPeople</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/new-york-times-goes-social-with-timespeople/#comment-7336505</link><description>Social Times in future will present enamorous application in front of us.the technically social it is the mutual thought of of this.which really true and affectable.their presence it is useful to us.now and in future it will be really effective.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:29:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New York Times Goes Social With TimesPeople</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/new-york-times-goes-social-with-timespeople/#comment-1574924</link><description>Thanks for the write up. I am glad you noticed the RSS feed and thought about the friendfeed angle. This is exactly what we were hoping for from more 'advanced' users. I have been using it this way for sometime - also the Facebook app provides some of the same benefit. Eventually, all the data will be available in different formats. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We tried to make the managing of contacts as simple and lightweight as possible - hence the google imports and the lack of data elements we require. Also all your friends on your user page are micro formatted for easier re-use.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dgottfrid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:38:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>