<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in LinkedIn Isn&amp;#8217;t Recession Proof Either</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/linkedin_isn8217t_recession_proof_either/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:54:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: LinkedIn Isn&amp;#8217;t Recession Proof Either</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/linkedin-isnt-recession-proof-either/1914#comment-3672511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The amount of layoffs is increasing daily.  Much of the publicized cuts are coming out of prominent companies.  I can only imagine how big the situation really is with the less well known new media, social networking, and software companies making mass layoffs that aren't getting as much attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Allan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:54:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LinkedIn Isn&amp;#8217;t Recession Proof Either</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/linkedin-isnt-recession-proof-either/1914#comment-3572445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Nick, great post.  Your post's title really surprised me as I, like you said, had just read about &lt;a href="http://LinkedIn.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="LinkedIn.com"&gt;LinkedIn.com&lt;/a&gt;'s strong increase in funding recently.  2009 will be interesting, to say the least.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cabezas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:08:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>