<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:41:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-12302407</link><description>I think it worth it. I can see lots of visitors on the site and people discussing and sharing every second.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">arabic cms</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:41:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-10724943</link><description>What an ass hole!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxxx</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:21:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-9532762</link><description>That's okay, they will improve in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Whereisaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:35:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-9531888</link><description>It can be happened with all the huge company as well. No one is perfect.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liontin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:43:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-4291913</link><description>Twitter is still going through funding meaning they're yet to be profitable yet. Just recovering the costs would be something that will take some time to achieve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">infinique</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:09:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-3642192</link><description>How well it takes off is dependent on how much they charge for the service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">globalrs</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 03:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-1574990</link><description>One of the smarter conclusions which has come out of the discussion about my post is the idea that PayPal wake up and build something on top of Twitter. I think the talk about Twitter's reliability is a valid one, but I state early in my post that the reliability issue is a constant for me. They either will or they won't fix things in the end. Clearly they can't proceed on any plan without fixing the most fundamental issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good discussion though!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate Westheimer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:09:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-1574992</link><description>I think you have a typo in there Nick. I believe it should be "p dcpatton $50".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dcpatton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:21:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-1574991</link><description>Nope.   Payment processing requires even more robust performance than Twitter's existing messaging/micro-blogging application.  You can't give people the fail whale when they are trying to buy something or pay a bill.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also Twitter would face competition from Facebook, PayPal (don't they essentially offer this already?), Google, etc.  In the end this would turn Twitter into an execution play, and they've already shown that they can't execute on various key aspects of their business, i.e. reliability and scalability.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dangrsmind</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:36:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>