<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Is OpenSocial Social at All?</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:54:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is OpenSocial Social at All?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/is-opensocial-social-at-all/#comment-1574098</link><description>I think OpenSocial might turn out to be more of an "open" Google Gadget standard. I think Google is just trying to do what Netvibes has been trying to do with the open UWA standard. However Google is, well, Google so they have a little more muscle. It will be interesting if they will be able to make the standard stick.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:54:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is OpenSocial Social at All?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/is-opensocial-social-at-all/#comment-1574097</link><description>Finally! I've been saying this for months. OpenSocial is closer to OpenGadgets or GoogleGadgets Platform for the web. We have to start distinguishing between a widget, and an actual App on these networks. One is far more robust than the other. &lt;br&gt;Relatively complex applications can be built on the facebook social graph, the same case cannot be said for opensocial yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad everyone isn't drinking all the google kool-aid/anti facebook kool-aid</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Breslin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is OpenSocial Social at All?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/is-opensocial-social-at-all/#comment-1574096</link><description>Canter has it completely wrong, but only because Google did such a poor job of defining OpenSocial that the blogosphere somehow assumed OpenSocial had something to do with social graph portability (hint: it doesn't).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OpenSocial is simply a broadly defined abstraction for connecting social "containers" (e.g.  platforms that manage a user's activity stream, friends and profile information) with social "applications" (e.g. web apps that manage this data and render inside containers).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In that sense, OpenSocial is exactly what it is designed to be: an "open" standard for social applications (vs. the proprietary standard defined by Facebook).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to whether the standard is more than "OpenGadgets": anyone can sign up for OpenSocial sandbox access and see for themselves: as of today, the Orkut sandbox has OpenSocial 0.6 implemented and yes, OpenSocial apps exist today that embrace the "social and profile components of a site."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And thanks to projects such as Shindig, OpenSocial apps are going to be running on more sites than people think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Danny</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is OpenSocial Social at All?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/is-opensocial-social-at-all/#comment-1574095</link><description>I'll know all I need to know once Orkut becomes OpenSocial compatible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ikepigott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:12:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is OpenSocial Social at All?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/is-opensocial-social-at-all/#comment-1574094</link><description>Wow! Scathing -- and accurate -- commentary!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:08:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>