<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Interview With Charlene Li, Author of Groundswell</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/interview_with_charlene_li_author_of_groundswell/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:09:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Interview With Charlene Li, Author of Groundswell</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/interview-with-charlene-li-author-of-groundswell/1372#comment-1574553</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good interview.  I think the biggest reason companies fear the "groundswell" is the lack of ownership of the conversation. When you get beyond that fear, SNS can be leveraged for product/service improvements in addition to value added customer services.  However, as a marketing tool SNS aren't as easy to track.  I think companies should approach SNS as good will as opposed to a marketing tool.  So, yes, focus on the relationship and not the technology like Paul said.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew Brown</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview With Charlene Li, Author of Groundswell</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/interview-with-charlene-li-author-of-groundswell/1372#comment-1574552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice interview... focus on the relationship not the technology.  Definitely agree that in a few years all of this "I'm going social" stuff will seem silly!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Worsham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:46:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>