I don't know that it was strictly necessary to mention in the write-up (yet again) your notion that WGS would best be used for dating; we all got that when we watched the interview and heard you mention it several times. I'm not sure why you felt compelled to call attention to it again in the write-up, unless you just had nothing else to say. But why would you call it a fact when it's clearly your opinion? You're re-defining what WGS has built, even though you were clearly told that's not what it is.
Intentionally or not, you're implying that WGS has built yet another dating app, except that they don't even know they have.
If it were my product, I think I'd be a little bit put off.
-Bill
Avatar
· 1 year ago
Good interview nick, glad to see a interview with Ann. :)
All Comments
Intentionally or not, you're implying that WGS has built yet another dating app, except that they don't even know they have.
If it were my product, I think I'd be a little bit put off.
-Bill