<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in How to Use Social Networks in Custody Battles</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/how_to_use_social_networks_in_custody_battles/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:53:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How to Use Social Networks in Custody Battles</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/how-to-use-social-networks-in-custody-battles/1826#comment-2633159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I'm not sure this is so funny. Stalking? Harassment? I'm particularly disturbed about the speaker's emphasis on doing this "under the radar."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Margy Rydzynski</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:53:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Use Social Networks in Custody Battles</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/how-to-use-social-networks-in-custody-battles/1826#comment-2620813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's the point?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Law of Unattracted</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:20:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>