<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in GlamApps Justifies BuddyMedia&amp;#8217;s Appvertisement Model</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/glamapps_justifies_buddymedia8217s_appvertisement_model/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 04:27:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: GlamApps Justifies BuddyMedia&amp;#8217;s Appvertisement Model</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/glamapps-justifies-buddymedias-appvertisement-model/1935#comment-152938788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your article covers most of aspects we should be careful. Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">remove Antivirus .NET</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 04:27:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GlamApps Justifies BuddyMedia&amp;#8217;s Appvertisement Model</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/glamapps-justifies-buddymedias-appvertisement-model/1935#comment-60610488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for providing such a interesting post. I totally agree with you and wish more people would write about thsi topic. Also some great comments from everyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">barristers chambers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 06:29:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GlamApps Justifies BuddyMedia&amp;#8217;s Appvertisement Model</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/glamapps-justifies-buddymedias-appvertisement-model/1935#comment-3948460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Nick, thanks for reporting on this.  I am developing a social network for women who are interested in learning more about beauty products.  Advertising was not going to be a major contributor to my revenue model but as I learn more about the use of appvertisements, I will reconsider this approach.  Thanks.&lt;br&gt;Ron Robinson&lt;br&gt;Founder, &lt;a href="http://beautystat.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="beautystat.com"&gt;beautystat.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonRobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:20:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GlamApps Justifies BuddyMedia&amp;#8217;s Appvertisement Model</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/glamapps-justifies-buddymedias-appvertisement-model/1935#comment-3896272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the mention Nick. I've been very clear about my vision for more than a year now. The opening of the social nets provides unprecedented access to consumers for brands. The single best way to reach them is by engaging them with something that brings value to them. The app is the new ad unit.  If you can engage a user as a brand (real engagement and not just light engagement), you can turn social networkers (faceless) into real social brand loyalists. We're seeing tremendous results w/ our 40+ clients and have some huge news coming down the pike that I'll keep you abreast of. Very exciting times for our industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lazerow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:48:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>