<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in Feed Standardization Will Commoditize Feed Aggregation, So Let&amp;#8217;s Create The Semantic Web!</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/feed_standardization_will_commoditize_feed_aggregation_so_let8217s_create_the_semantic_web/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:50:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Feed Standardization Will Commoditize Feed Aggregation, So Let&amp;#8217;s Create The Semantic Web!</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/feed-semantic-web/2138#comment-7385895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My take is: there is quite a mess of information if you look at Facebook or Twitter homepage, not to mention Friendfeed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think this is a result of a poor information design, especially the social graph is on my mind. The quality of relationships with my friends/followers should be the key lifestream filtering criteria. The social graph should hold more data about the given relationship. There are tools to provide such a help: XFN and FOAF microformats. However the microformat adoption is not widespread. So at the end of the day, we are back at the semantics :)  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jan Horna</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:50:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>