<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Times - Latest Comments in CurrentTV: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Profitable&amp;#8221;, Twitter: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Not&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://socialtimes.disqus.com/currenttv_8220we8217re_profitable8221_twitter_8220we8217re_not8221/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:42:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: CurrentTV: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Profitable&amp;#8221;, Twitter: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Not&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/currenttv-twitter-web2summit/1915#comment-48462719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for such a informative post. This is always a hot topic for debates and made a interesting read. Could have done with a few more pictures if possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">barristers chambers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:42:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CurrentTV: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Profitable&amp;#8221;, Twitter: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Not&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/currenttv-twitter-web2summit/1915#comment-45271393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow ! this is really a good post, with interesting information. I liked your style and have bookmarked your site for future visit. Thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Castelle patio furniture</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:36:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CurrentTV: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Profitable&amp;#8221;, Twitter: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Not&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/currenttv-twitter-web2summit/1915#comment-44703237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, few interesting issues covered. Like your style. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Speeding Fines</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CurrentTV: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Profitable&amp;#8221;, Twitter: &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Not&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/currenttv-twitter-web2summit/1915#comment-3575552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're crowdsourcing creative at Poptent, too and we believe this model will grow and change into a compelling, and money-making model.  I'm glad to see Current, certainly a leader in this realm, is doing well!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Schoneveld</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:10:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>