http://socialtimes.disqus.com/enThu, 01 Jan 2009 03:31:50 -0000http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/2008-the-year-for-twitter/1144#comment-4812289<p>A year after your post, I still agree with your points. <a href="http://www.newmediawhack.com/the-year-of-twitter/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newmediawhack.com/the-year-of-twitter/">http://www.newmediawhack.co...</a><br></p>newmediawhackThu, 01 Jan 2009 03:31:50 -0000http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/2008-the-year-for-twitter/1144#comment-1574092<p>Seriously, you'd think by now they could keep the damn thing up for more than 2 hours at a time. Besides that, though, I'll keep coming back. It's one of the few online "community" tools I've ever used that actually makes me feel like I'm part of a community.</p>Jordan HirschThu, 31 Jan 2008 14:42:58 -0000http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/2008-the-year-for-twitter/1144#comment-1574091<p>If they get over their scaling issues and eliminate the downtime (the last 24 hrs have been pretty bad) then we will see them explode...hopefully the servers can keep up!</p>acafourekThu, 31 Jan 2008 11:51:15 -0000